District Attorney Jay Boyarski, party to the crime of Conspiracy to grand theft and forgery

 

The courts  

To all members of the press

This is a press release of grand theft  in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving Assistant District Attorney Jay Boyarsky, Presiding Judge Rise Pinchon,  Assistant presiding Judge Lucas, Judge James Stoelker  and Attorney Richard Gullen

______________________________________________________

                            DA Jay boyarsky

Boyarsky copy

 

 

The public has a general distrust of attorneys for their rapacity and endless stretching of case so as to excise the maximum bucks from their clients.

Most folks avoid them as they would rats infested with the bubonic plague. Unfortunately they need them. Most attorneys are crooked but  stay within the bounds of the law. Gullen has an edge, he has three Judges in his pocket,Presiding Judge Rise Pinchon,  Judge Patricia Lucas and Judge James Stoelker  of the Santa Clara Superior Court.  What Gullen and Lucas and Stoelker and Presiding Judge Rise Pinchon  did is to conspire to steal from me the sum of $31,084. They did this by flagrantly violating every statutes in the book.

Trusting on the District Attorney’s office to rectify matters, I filed a demand to compel DA Jay Boyarsky to prosecute the above three Judges and attorney. This is his reply.

 

Hello Mr. Marosi,
I am sorry that you are still embroiled in this unfortunate dispute.  I recall with some level of fondness some of our communications from the past.
The “motion to compel” is not a viable legal request.
As I think I’ve explained, you have certain options, most of them involve hiring counsel to pursue civil rememdies.  The Santa Clara County Bar Association can provide attorney referrals.
Again, I am sorry that I cannot comply with your legal filings.
Jay Boyarsky
 The hell of it is that None of the Judges or attorney dispute they are guilty of the crimes of grand theft and forgery.

On  11/10/2015 I filed Motions stating as follows:

1.Demand to compel James Stoelker and Patricia Lucas to dispute that they are out of Jurisdiction and trespassers of the law

2. Demand to compel James Stoelker, Patricia Lucas and Richard Gullen to dispute that they have conspired to commit grand theft 

    3.Demand to compel James Stoelker, Patricia     Lucas, Richard Gullen and Clerk Lan Wang to  void  Judgments within 3     days of filing  this pleading

 Unless Lucas and Stoelker, Clerk Lan Wang and Gullen can dispute their lack of jurisdiction and consequent trespassing of the law they must void all rulings they have made in this case within 3 days of filing of this pleading.Else ,they admit they have conspired to commit grand theft, forgery, perjury, denial of due process, denial of equal protection under the law.

 

Demand to Judge Pinchon to agree she trespasses on the law if she fails to compel Clerk Lan Wang to do her duty within 3 days

 

Neither Pinchon,  Lucas, Stoelker, Gullen and clerk Lan Wang disputed the above motions. Therefore, they admit being guilty of the charges.

                    _______________________________________           

  Patricia Lucas

Lucas photo

She has been a member of the Santa Clara County Superior Court bench for less than 9 years, but already Lucas has made a deep impression on the bar community. She has not made  a deep impression on any Proper litigant that has faced her. 

Lucas has just been appointed to the post of Assistant Presiding Judge with Judge Pinchon as Presiding Judge. Since Lucas admits trespassing on the Law, Judge Pinchon will have to dismiss her as assistant presiding Judge.

She discriminates and hates proper litigants and will deny them all rights and protection

                                  Lucas ratings.pdf

_________________________________________________

                                  James Stoelker

Mount Principal James L. Stoelker Appointed to Superior Court

James Stoelker, principal at Mount & Stoelker, PC, has been appointed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to serve as a judge on the Santa Clara County Superior Court.

61-year old Judge Stoelker of Saratoga brings more than three decades of experience to the legal profession. He joined Mount in 1987 and practiced in the areas of real property and title insurance litigation.

Mr Stoelker  discriminates and hates proper litigants and will deny them all rights and protection. Check following link and appreciate how honest Stoelker is 

Stoelker refuses to recuse himself

By the way, neither Lucas nor Stoelker dispute they have committed conspiracy to grand theft. Link to the following Motions

 Grand theft by Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen

—————————————————————————

               As the Stomach turns. Corruption in the Superior Court the              County of Santa Clara

                         On 10/13/2014 I filed a demand  to suspend Gullen.  This suspension disqualifies any Judge from ruling on my case.

                        On 11/28/2014 I filed a motion to cancel the Lucas    12/11/2014 hearing  not disputed By Gullen or Lucas. That hearing could not be held  nor could Lucas issue a ruling  on that date since Gullen was  suspended. Nevertheless On 12/11/2014 Lucas ruled for default,  void since Gullen was  suspended . Also she did not sign it  which immediately made it a forgery.

On  1/28/2015 I filed a motion to vacate Lucas’s   order which was not  disputed.

  On    7/9/2015  Gullen filed a Request for Court  Judgment which was void and  a forgery, since I had filed 1/28/2014  motion  to vacate and he was suspended from filing docs  in the court.Also I was not served.

   On 9/2/2015 Judge Stoelker rendered judgment for Gullen for $31,084. With Gullen suspended, Stoelker’s ruling was a forgery since he could not rule in this case.

On 10/15/2015 Gullen filed a Notice of abstract of Judgment, a forgery because he was suspended.

Then between 10/21/2015 and 11/18,2015 I filed a total of 8 Motions essentially to void five documents as follows

Demand to compel the Clerk of the Court Lan Wang to void all forged motions filed by Richard Gullen and validated by Out of Jurisdiction Lucas and Stoelker ,

  1. 12/11/2014 Default ruling by Lucas 
  2. 1/16/2015 Notice of Entry of order (Appendix 
  3. 7/9/2015 request for Court Judgment
  4. 10/6/2015 Stoelker Judgment (Appendix D)
  5. 10/15/2015 Gullen abstract of Judgment (Appendix E)

All of those motions were ignored by and not disputed  by  Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen   

_______________________________________

                Pinchon, Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen committed 245 criminal  violations of the California Penal Code as  follows:

Perjury, forgery, denial of due process,  obstruction of Justice, abuse of power,  denial of equal protection under the law, Conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to  commit grand theft of $31,000.

   The total counts is 245 Counts of Criminal Violations of the                         California Penal Code for Boyarsky, Pinchon, Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen

 Each count is at least 6 Months   jail. Therefore each is                             theoretically looking at 122   years jail time

 _____________________________________________________

Chapter 5. Larceny – California Penal Code Section 487

  • 




Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases:(a) When the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars $950

        ——————

Background

On May 10th 2013, I mailed Old Republic title a demand for $82,184 for a property at 144 South 20th, San Jose which 2d deed of trust to the former owners the Mc Neils  had not been paid of. On Dec 23rd, 1991 a deed of trust for the amount of $   2 6, 000  was recorded .On 8/1/2003, I received a payoff demand from Alliance Title for $26,000 which I signed on 9/3/2003 and mailed back on 9/3/2003. Alliance did not pay me off.

Around April of 2013 I found the original note of $26,000 for that property and realized that it was never paid off. Old Republic Title who had issued title insurance paid me  of $75,000. It  then sued the Mcneill asserting they had kept the pay off money

I was then countersued by the McNeils on the Grounds they had paid off. Attorney Gullen represented the McNeils. On his brief he accused me of fraud without any evidence. 

This case has been going on since June 17/2014. The Court has subjected me to a constant barrage of illegal Maneuvers. I have made a study of the ratings of the 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior court and have found out of the 89  only six honest enough to render Justice. The Court assigned two Judges  to my case who I immediately recused. The third Judge assigned was Patricia Lucas.  Click on the following link and you find out she has six ratings from defendants whose rights have been trampled by her.

  Lucas ratings.pdf

 

Patricia Lucas, Assistant Presiding Judge and Judge James Stoelker of the Santa Clara Superior Court and Attorney Gullen conspire to commit Grand theft

Lady Justice
Lady Justice

 

Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice
Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The courts  

To all members of the press

This is a press release of grand theft  in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving  Assistant presiding Judge Lucas, Judge James Stoelker  and Attorney Richard Gullen

______________________________________________________

                                  Richard Gullen, A corrupt Attorney and a thief

Richard gullen

The public has a general distrust of attorneys for their rapacity and endless stretching of case so as to excise the maximum bucks from their clients.

Most folks avoid them as they would rats infested with the bubonic plague. Unfortunately they need them. Most attorneys are crooked but  stay within the bounds of the law. Gullen has an edge, he has two Judges in his pocket, Judge Patricia Lucas and Judge James Stoelker  of the Santa Clara Superior Court.  What Gullen and Lucas and Stoelker did is to conspire to steal from me the sum of $31,084. They did this by flagrantly violating every statutes in the book.

On  11/10/2015 I filed Motions stating as follows:

1.Demand to compel James Stoelker and Patricia Lucas to dispute that they are out of Jurisdiction and trespassers of the law

2. Demand to compel James Stoelker, Patricia Lucas and Richard Gullen to dispute that they have conspired to commit grand theft

    3.Demand to compel James Stoelker, Patricia     Lucas, Richard Gullen and Clerk Lan Wang to  void  Judgments within 3     days of filing  this pleading

 Unless Lucas and Stoelker, Clerk Lan Wang and Gullen can dispute their lack of jurisdiction and consequent trespassing of the law they must void all rulings they have made in this case within 3 days of filing of this pleading.Else ,they admit they have conspired to commit grand theft, forgery, perjury, denial of due process, denial of equal protection under the law.

 

Neither Lucas, Stoelker, Gullen and clerk Lan Wang disputed the above motions. Therefore, they admit being guilty of the charges.

                    _______________________________________           

 

 

  Patricia Lucas

 

Lucas photo

She has been a member of the Santa Clara County Superior Court bench for less than 9 years, but already Lucas has made a deep impression on the bar community. She has not made  a deep impression on any Proper litigant that has faced her.

Lucas has just been appointed to the post of Assistant Presiding Judge with Judge Pinchon as Presiding Judge. Since Lucas admits trespassing on the Law, Judge Pinchon will have to dismiss her as assistant presiding Judge.

She discriminates and hates proper litigants and will deny them all rights and protection

                                  Lucas ratings.pdf

_________________________________________________

                                  James Stoelker

Mount Principal James L. Stoelker Appointed to Superior Court

James Stoelker, principal at Mount & Stoelker, PC, has been appointed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to serve as a judge on the Santa Clara County Superior Court.

61-year old Judge Stoelker of Saratoga brings more than three decades of experience to the legal profession. He joined Mount in 1987 and practiced in the areas of real property and title insurance litigation.

Mr Stoelker  discriminates and hates proper litigants and will deny them all rights and protection. Check following link and appreciate how honest Stoelker is 

Stoelker refuses to recuse himself

By the way, neither Lucas nor Stoelker dispute they have committed conspiracy to grand theft. Link to the following Motions

 Grand theft by Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen

—————————————————————————

               As the Stomach turns. Corruption in the Superior Court the              County of Santa Clara

                         On 10/13/2014 I filed a demand  to suspend Gullen.  This suspension disqualifies any Judge from ruling on my case.

                        On 11/28/2014 I filed a motion to cancel the Lucas    12/11/2014 hearing  not disputed By Gullen or Lucas. That hearing could not be held  nor could Lucas issue a ruling  on that date since Gullen was  suspended. Nevertheless On 12/11/2014 Lucas ruled for default,  void since Gullen was  suspended . Also she did not sign it  which immediately made it a forgery.

On  1/28/2015 I filed a motion to vacate Lucas’s   order which was not  disputed.

  On    7/9/2015  Gullen filed a Request for Court  Judgment which was void and  a forgery, since I had filed 1/28/2014  motion  to vacate and he was suspended from filing docs  in the court.Also I was not served.

   On 9/2/2015 Judge Stoelker rendered judgment for Gullen for $31,084. With Gullen suspended, Stoelker’s ruling was a forgery since he could not rule in this case.

On 10/15/2015 Gullen filed a Notice of abstract of Judgment, a forgery because he was suspended.

Then between 10/21/2015 and 11/18,2015 I filed a total of 8 Motions essentially to void five documents as follows

Demand to compel the Clerk of the Court Lan Wang to void all forged motions filed by Richard Gullen and validated by Out of Jurisdiction Lucas and Stoelker ,

  1. 12/11/2014 Default ruling by Lucas
  2. 1/16/2015 Notice of Entry of order (Appendix 
  3. 7/9/2015 request for Court Judgment
  4. 10/6/2015 Stoelker Judgment (Appendix D)
  5. 10/15/2015 Gullen abstract of Judgment (Appendix E)

All of those motions were ignored by and not disputed  by  Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen   

_______________________________________

                Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen committed 245 criminal                violations of the California Penal Code as  follows:

Perjury, forgery, denial of due process,  obstruction of Justice, abuse of power,  denial of equal protection under the law, Conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to  commit grand theft of $31,000.

   The total counts is 245 Counts of Criminal Violations of the                         California Penal Code for Lucas, Stoelker and Gullen

 Each count is at least 6 Months   jail. Therefore each is                             theoretically looking at 122   years jail time

 _____________________________________________________

Chapter 5. Larceny – California Penal Code Section 487

  • 




Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases:(a) When the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars $950

        ——————

 

Background

On May 10th 2013, I mailed Old Republic title a demand for $82,184 for a property at 144 South 20th, San Jose which 2d deed of trust to the former owners the Mc Neils  had not been paid of. On Dec 23rd, 1991 a deed of trust for the amount of $   2 6, 000  was recorded .On 8/1/2003, I received a payoff demand from Alliance Title for $26,000 which I signed on 9/3/2003 and mailed back on 9/3/2003. Alliance did not pay me off.

Around April of 2013 I found the original note of $26,000 for that property and realized that it was never paid off. Old Republic Title who had issued title insurance paid me  of $75,000. It  then sued the Mcneill asserting they had kept the pay off money

I was then countersued by the McNeils on the Grounds they had paid off. Attorney Gullen represented the McNeils. On his brief he accused me of fraud without any evidence. 

This case has been going on since June 17/2014. The Court has subjected me to a constant barrage of illegal Maneuvers. I have made a study of the ratings of the 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior court and have found out of the 89  only six honest enough to render Justice. The Court assigned two Judges  to my case who I immediately recused. The third Judge assigned was Patricia Lucas.  Click on the following link and you find out she has six ratings from defendants whose rights have been trampled by her.

  Lucas ratings.pdf

Between 8/12/2014 and today 9/25/2014, I  filed over ten motions addressed to Presiding Judge Walsh to recuse her. In the process I identified against her 54 Criminal Violations of the California Penal code. I filed a summary Judgment against The McNeils which was not answered and therefore should have been granted by the Court. Nevertheless, Judge Lucas Issued a tentative order on 8/18/2014  which she finalized on 8/18/2014 although Attorney Gullen did not show up at the hearing on 8/19/2014. This clearly proved Gullen conspiring with Judge Lucas to deny me my due process 

  Motion for Judge Walsh to enforce the law 

 

Rossi and Hammerschlough, A Law firm, Thieves

Lady Justice
Lady Justice
Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice
Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

 

The courts  

To all members of the press

This is a press release of grand theft  in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving Judge Lucas and the firm of Rossi, Hammerslough, Reischl & Chuck and Attorney Gullen

                                  Rossi, Hammerslough etc, A corrupt law firm( will abbreviate to Rossi,etc

The public has a general distrust of attorneys for their rapacity and endless stretching of case so as to excise the maximum bucks from their clients.

Most folks avoid them as they would rats infested with the bubonic plague. Unfortunately they need them. Most attorneys are crooked but  stay within the bounds of the law. Rossi,etc have an edge, they hav a Judge in his pocket, Judge Patricia Lucas of the Santa Clara Superior Court. Judge lucas must have been spawn from the union of minor demon with a Black forest witch. What Rossi,etc and Lucas did is to steal from me the sum of $31,084. They did this by flagrantly violating every statutes in the book. Attorney Gullen is

member of Rossi,etc. That firm is perfectly aware of what Gullen has done. They have ignored every request from me to wipe out the fraudulent default Judgment against me. They are therefore accessories to Grand Theft and equally guilty. 

Chapter 5. Larceny – California Penal Code Section 487

  • 




Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases:

(a) When the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars $950

      

Please read the background below to familiarize yourself with the case.

On 1/27/2015 I filed the following:

Demand to vacate Ex Judge Lucas’s order to grant default in favor of the Mc Neils  of 12/11/14 as null and void

 Dishonorable Judge Lucas has no judicial powers and is totally out of jurisdiction in this or any case since she never disputed the above default demand.

Also I suspended Attorney Gullen on October 13, 2014, therefore he is comitting a criminal violation of the California Penal Code by continuing to represent his client

10/13/2014 Motion to compel Court to suspend Attorney Gullen from case

 Attorney Gullen pled guilty by default to 102 Criminal counts of criminal violations of the California Penal Code. Therefore, he must be forbidden to represent any client and is immediately suspended from this case and may not file any paper in Court henceforth

The above proved conspiracy to commit grand theft of $31,084  by Judge Lucas and Gullen since they both knew they were out of Jurisdiction in this case.    

 

 

 

Background

On May 10th 2013, I mailed Old Republic title a demand for $82,184 for a property at 144 South 20th, San Jose which 2d deed of trust to the former owners the Mc Neils  had not been paid of. On Dec 23rd, 1991 a deed of trust for the amount of $   2 6, 000  was recorded in book L797 of official records , page 281.On 8/1/2003, I received a payoff demand from Alliance Title for $26,000 which I signed on 9/3/2003 and mailed back on 9/3/2003. Alliance did not pay me off.

Around April of 2013 I found the original note of $26,000 for that property and realized that it was never paid off. I therefore contacted Old Republic who paid off and  sued the Mc Neilsfor the pay off.   I was then countersued by the McNeils on the Grounds they had paid off. Attorney Gullen represented the McNeils. On his brief he accused me of fraud without any evidence. On 7/27/2014 I filed  Summary Judgment since There are no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in this complaint can be decided without trial. Click on following link for detail. After I recused two Judges the case was assigned to Judge Patricia Lucas who turned out to be most brazenly corrupt Judge I have ever encountered. Within two months I identified 130 Criminal violations of the California Penal Code she committed. I appealed to Judge Walsh in every one of my more than ten motions, but he stonewalled me and ignored every motions.

Lucas  denied my summary Judgment which she could not, based on CCP585 which states a summary Judgment must be granted if defendant does not dispute the Judgment. Gullen never filed an opposing motion. This proves he bribed Judge Lucas.

Amended summary Judgment

 

This case has been going on since June 17/2014. The Court has subjected me to a constant barrage of illegal Maneuvers. I have made a study of the ratings of the 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior court and have found out of the 89  only six honest enough to render Justice. The Court assigned two Judges  to my case who I immediately recused. The third Judge assigned was Patricia Lucas. Upon checking her ratings on the Robing Room Site which rates Judges I found out that she is totally prejudiced. Click on the following link and you find out she has six ratings from defendants whose rights have been trampled by her.

  Lucas ratings.pdf

Therefore I recused her  on 8/12/2014, based on ccp 170.1 which states recusal is appropriate if you suspect prejudice.  She struck the recusal on 9/18/2014. Between 8/12/2014 and today 9/25/2014, I have filed over ten motions addressed to Presiding Judge Walsh to recuse her. In the process I identified against her 54 Criminal Violations of the California Penal code. I filed a summary Judgment against The McNeils which were not answered and therefore should have been granted by the Court. Nevertheless, Judge Lucas Issued a tentative order on 8/18/2014  which she finalized on 8/18/2014 although Attorney Gullen did not show up at the hearing on 8/19/2014. This clearly proved Gullen conspiring with Judge Lucas to deny me my due process. Following link shows How Judge Walsh has broken the law.

    Motion for Judge Walsh to enforce the law 

 

 

n

Attorney Richard Gullen, a corrupt attorney

 

On 1/27/2015 I filed the following:

Demand to vacate Ex Judge Lucas’s order to grant default in favor of the Mc Neils  of 12/11/14 as null and void

 

nRichard gullen

Attorney Richard Gullen, a corrupt attorney

 

Richard Gullen, Attorney, a crook

Lady Justice
Lady Justice
Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice
Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The courts  

To all members of the press

This is a press release of grand theft  in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving Judge Lucas and Attorney Richard Gullen

                                  Richard Gullen, A corrupt attorney

The public has a general distrust of attorneys for their rapacity and endless stretching of case so as to excise the maximum bucks from their clients.

Most folks avoid them as they would rats infested with the bubonic plague. Unfortunately they need them. Most attorneys are crooked but  stay within the bounds of the law. Gallen has an edge, he has a Judge in his pocket, Judge Patricia Lucas of the Santa Clara Superior Court. Judge lucas must have been spawn from the union of minor demon with a Black forest witch. What Gullen and Lucas did is to steal from me the sum of $31,084. They did this by flagrantly violating every statutes in the book.

Chapter 5. Larceny – California Penal Code Section 487

  • 




Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases:

(a) When the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding nine hundred fifty dollars $950

        ——————

Please read the background below to familiarize yourself with the case.

On 1/27/2015 I filed the following:

Demand to vacate Ex Judge Lucas’s order to grant default in favor of the Mc Neils  of 12/11/14 as null and void

 Dishonorable Judge Lucas has no judicial powers and is totally out of jurisdiction in this or any case since she never disputed the above default demand.

Also I suspended Attorney Gullen on October 13, 2014, therefore he is comitting a criminal violation of the California Penal Code by continuing to represent his client

10/13/2014 Motion to compel Court to suspend Attorney Gullen from case

 Attorney Gullen pled guilty by default to 102 Criminal counts of criminal violations of the California Penal Code. Therefore, he must be forbidden to represent any client and is immediately suspended from this case and may not file any paper in Court henceforth

The above proved conspiracy to commit grand theft of $31,084  by Judge Lucas and Gullen since they both knew they were out of Jurisdiction in this case.    

 

 

 

Background

On May 10th 2013, I mailed Old Republic title a demand for $82,184 for a property at 144 South 20th, San Jose which 2d deed of trust to the former owners the Mc Neils  had not been paid of. On Dec 23rd, 1991 a deed of trust for the amount of $   2 6, 000  was recorded in book L797 of official records , page 281.On 8/1/2003, I received a payoff demand from Alliance Title for $26,000 which I signed on 9/3/2003 and mailed back on 9/3/2003. Alliance did not pay me off.

Around April of 2013 I found the original note of $26,000 for that property and realized that it was never paid off. I therefore contacted Old Republic who paid off and  sued the Mc Neilsfor the pay off.   I was then countersued by the McNeils on the Grounds they had paid off. Attorney Gullen represented the McNeils. On his brief he accused me of fraud without any evidence. On 7/27/2014 I filed  Summary Judgment since There are no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in this complaint can be decided without trial. Click on following link for detail. After I recused two Judges the case was assigned to Judge Patricia Lucas who turned out to be most brazenly corrupt Judge I have ever encountered. Within two months I identified 130 Criminal violations of the California Penal Code she committed. I appealed to Judge Walsh in every one of my more than ten motions, but he stonewalled me and ignored every motions.

Lucas  denied my summary Judgment which she could not, based on CCP585 which states a summary Judgment must be granted if defendant does not dispute the Judgment. Gullen never filed an opposing motion. This proves he bribed Judge Lucas.

Amended summary Judgment

 

This case has been going on since June 17/2014. The Court has subjected me to a constant barrage of illegal Maneuvers. I have made a study of the ratings of the 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior court and have found out of the 89  only six honest enough to render Justice. The Court assigned two Judges  to my case who I immediately recused. The third Judge assigned was Patricia Lucas. Upon checking her ratings on the Robing Room Site which rates Judges I found out that she is totally prejudiced. Click on the following link and you find out she has six ratings from defendants whose rights have been trampled by her.

  Lucas ratings.pdf

Therefore I recused her  on 8/12/2014, based on ccp 170.1 which states recusal is appropriate if you suspect prejudice.  She struck the recusal on 9/18/2014. Between 8/12/2014 and today 9/25/2014, I have filed over ten motions addressed to Presiding Judge Walsh to recuse her. In the process I identified against her 54 Criminal Violations of the California Penal code. I filed a summary Judgment against The McNeils which were not answered and therefore should have been granted by the Court. Nevertheless, Judge Lucas Issued a tentative order on 8/18/2014  which she finalized on 8/18/2014 although Attorney Gullen did not show up at the hearing on 8/19/2014. This clearly proved Gullen conspiring with Judge Lucas to deny me my due process. Following link shows How Judge Walsh has broken the law.

    Motion for Judge Walsh to enforce the law 

 

 

nRichard gullen

Attorney Richard Gullen, a corrupt attorney

 

Santa Clara Superior Court conspires with CJP, bar association and District attorney to cover up criminal acts by corrupt Judges

To all members of the press

This is a press release of Corruption in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving all the Judges of the Court

                                      You may reach me at 650-969-2457 and my email is gmarosi@aol

The entire Superior Court of Santa Clara County  has brazenly conspired with the CJP, the Bar Association, the Santa Clara District Attorneys’ s office to cover up criminal violations of the California Penal Code by four Judges of the Court. I have indisputable evidence that the entire court has  been bribed by Attorney Gullen, and his firm, Hammerschlough.  The court has  violated all the rules and statutes of the Constitution to cover up those  criminal acts of those Judges

I have proven  Ex Judge Patricia Lucas to be mentally impaired, incompetent and corrupt . She has conspired with Attorney Richard Gullen to strip me of my constitutional rights to impartial Justice.

I filed six Motions with Presiding Judge Walsh to impeach, suspend, remove  Lucas . He ignored all those motions. I  filed motions with Judge Kirwan to grant summary Judgments against the McNeils and Attorney Gullen. All those motions were ignored.

Judge Symons ,while out of jurisdiction,  filed a ruling absolving Judge Lucas of all crimes. I filed motions accusing above Judges of conspiring with Attorney Gullen to deny me due process. I accused them of being bribed by Gullen. None of those motions were disputed.

I  filed Motions with the Bar association to disbar Judges Lucas, Kirwan, Walsh and Symons. Those motions were ignored. I then filed Motions with the Commission for Judicial performance  to remove Lucas, Kirwan, Walsh and Symons from the Court. I filed motions with the Santa Clara District attorney’s office to prosecute above Judges, Attorney Gullen and against Law Offices of Rossi, Hamerslough, Reischl & Chuck. Click on following link for details.

Mentally impaired judge Lucas  allowed to sit in bench

I filed punitive damages against Lucas and the Bar Association. Again those motions were ignored. It is evident the Superior Court of Santa Clara has conspired to commit fraud with the CJP, the Bar Association, The Santa Clara  District Attorney’s office, Attorney Gullen and  the firm of Rossi, Hammerschlough .

All of the above Judges and agencies have conspired to commit fraud, deliberately denied me due process, discriminated against me, denied me equal protection under the law, abused their power, obstructed Justice, committed perjury. they have been bribed by Gullen and the firm of Hammerschlough to deny me my rights.

The 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior Court allow her to sit on the bench to deal out her brand of injustice in direct criminal violation of the California Penal Code.

Check details at my blog   legal.gilbertmarosi.net

As shown from the case docket, she presides at dept 2,  I recused her and filed six motions to impeach or suspend her,which she did not dispute. Nevertheless from 8/19/2014 to present she continues to unlawfully hear this case and other cases.

Since the beginning of this case she has shown ignorance of every statute and applicable law or rules of the court. She has violated the three canons of Judicial Ethics. She is no more fit to sit on the bench as the local plumber. Yet 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior Court turn a blind eye to her irrational decisions and allow her to slash her way through defenseless litigants.

    docket 

Following is the motion I filed on 1/29/2015

6xth motion for default Judgment against ex Judge Lucas for Court to remove her from the bench

Ex-Judge Lucas is mentally impaired, irrational, clearly incompetent since she is totally ignorant of the statutes and rules of the Court which must be complied with.

Following is evidence proving the above:

1: Lucas disregarded and did not dispute Twenty eight Motions filed between Aug 2014 and present

CCP 854c states any motion undisputed before the deadline must be granted. How could Lucas disregard the motions unless she is mentally impaired and irrational. She shows total ignorance of the applicable laws and statutes and violates the canons of Judicial Ethics.

2.Since Attorney Jones dismissed his case against McNeil on 12/15/2015. This case is now terminated,Yet Lucas filed an order as follows:

Pursuant to Notice filed 11/25/14

Answer and cross complaint of Cecilia and Gilbert Marosi is stricken and default entered

Obviously Lucas is not in her right mind!

 

3. I suspended Attorney Gullen on 11/5/2014. Yet he continues to represent McNeil. This makes the order null and void. Lucas was perfectly aware of this, yet she ignored thus proving she is indeed mentally impaired and irrational therefore incompetent to rule in this  or any case

  1. I recused Lucas back on Aug 12th, 2014 which she never disputed. She was therefore out of jurisdiction right from the beginning, She disregarded that recusal and all further motions to remove her from the bench.

Any Judge is his right mind would have immediately recused herself from that case, yet she did not. Again this proves her  deranged and irrational and brain dead

Presiding Judge Walsh refuses to suspend Judge Patricia Lucas who does not dispute the 356 criminal violations of the California penal Code. He refuses to grant my summary Judgments. He refuses to sanction Attorney Gullen although I have proven he has bribed Judge Lucas. he is also accessory to the above criminal violations including bribery. Judge Walsh must be recalled and removed from the bench which he has disgraced.

Every single judge of the Santa Clara Superior Court is an accessory to 356 Criminal Violations of the California Penal Code since they ignored the motions served on every one of the above Judges to remove the four corrupt Judges, Lucas, Walsh Kirwan and Symons.

The entire Santa Clara Superior court is nothing but an organized crime organization  involved in a pattern of racketeering and should be convicted under the RICO criminal statute (18U.S.C.A &1963). The Superior Court flagrantly has conspired against me, committed fraud, discriminated against me, abused their power, obstructed Justice, denied me equal protection under the law. All of this to shield  deranged, lunatic Judge Patricia Lucas from beeing booted from the bench and sentenced  to theoretically 128 years Jail along with her coconspirators, Kirwan, Walsh and Symons.

 

 

 

Deranged and Lunatic Judge Lucas is allowed to stay on bench

corrupt judges

Deranged and dishonorable Judge Patricia Lucas

 

 

To all members of the press

This is a press release of Corruption in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving Presiding Judge Brian Walsh, Judge Lucas and Attorney Richard Gullen

                                      You may reach me at 650-969-2457 and my email is gmarosi@aol

Judge Lucas is mentally impaired, and corrupt

I have proven that Ex Judge Patricia Lucas is mentally impaired, incompetent, corrupt and has conspired with Attorney Richard Gullen to strip me of my constitutional rights to impartial Justice.

The 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior Court allow her to sit on the bench to deal out her brand of injustice in direct criminal violation of the California Penal Code.

Check details at my blog   legal.gilbertmarosi.net

As shown from the case docket, she presides at dept 2,  I recused her and filed six motions to impeach or suspend her,which she did not dispute. Nevertheless from 8/19/2014 to present she continues to unlawfully hear this case and other cases.

Since the beginning of this case she has shown ignorance of every statute and applicable law or rules of the court. She has violated the three canons of Judicial Ethics. She is no more fit to sit on the bench as the local plumber. Yet 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior Court turn a blind eye to her irrational decisions and allow her to slash her way through defenseless litigants.

    docket 

Following is the motion I filed on 1/29/2015

6xth motion for default Judgment against ex Judge Lucas for Court to remove her from the bench

Ex-Judge Lucas is mentally impaired, irrational, clearly incompetent since she is totally ignorant of the statutes and rules of the Court which must be complied with.

Following is evidence proving the above:

1: Lucas disregarded and did not dispute Twenty eight Motions filed between Aug 2014 and present

CCP 854c states any motion undisputed before the deadline must be granted. How could Lucas disregard the motions unless she is mentally impaired and irrational. She shows total ignorance of the applicable laws and statutes and violates the canons of Judicial Ethics.

2.Since Attorney Jones dismissed his case against McNeil on 12/15/2015. This case is now terminated,Yet Lucas filed an order as follows:

Pursuant to Notice filed 11/25/14

Answer and cross complaint of Cecilia and Gilbert Marosi is stricken and default entered

Obviously Lucas is not in her right mind!

 

3. I suspended Attorney Gullen on 11/5/2014. Yet he continues to represent McNeil. This makes the order null and void. Lucas was perfectly aware of this, yet she ignored thus proving she is indeed mentally impaired and irrational therefore incompetent to rule in this  or any case

  1. I recused Lucas back on Aug 12th, 2014 which she never disputed. She was therefore out of jurisdiction right from the beginning, She disregarded that recusal and all further motions to remove her from the bench.

Any Judge is his right mind would have immediately recused herself from that case, yet she did not. Again this proves her  deranged and irrational and brain dead

Presiding Judge Walsh refuses to suspend Judge Patricia Lucas who does not dispute the 356 criminal violations of the California penal Code. He refuses to grant my summary Judgments. He refuses to sanction Attorney Gullen although I have proven he has bribed Judge Lucas. he is also accessory to the above criminal violations including bribery. Judge Walsh must be recalled and removed from the bench which he has disgraced.

 

 

 

Attorney Richard Gullen, a corrupt attorney

Lady Justice
Lady Justice
Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice
Gilbert Marosi Fighting Against Injustice

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The courts 

To all members of the press

This is a press release of Corruption in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving Presiding Judge Brian Walsh, Judge Lucas and Attorney Richard Gullen

                                  Richard Gullen, A corrupt attorney

Below is the code describing the crime of bribery. Attorney Richard Gullen fits the crime exactly. I have catalogued and proven he has commited 356 criminal violations of the California Penal Code . His actions in the Superior Court of Santa Clara clearly shows him conspiring together with the entire Superior Court to deny me my due process.

18 U.S. Code § 201 – Bribery of public officials and witnesses

(b) Whoever—

(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

     Background:

On May 10th 2013, I mailed Old Republic title a demand for $82,184 for a property at 144 South 20th, San Jose which 2d deed of trust to the former owners the Mc Neils  had not been paid of. On Dec 23rd, 1991 a deed of trust for the amount of $   2 6, 000  was recorded in book L797 of official records , page 281.On 8/1/2003, I received a payoff demand from Alliance Title for $26,000 which I signed on 9/3/2003 and mailed back on 9/3/2003. Alliance did not pay me off.

Around April of 2013 I found the original note of $26,000 for that property and realized that it was never paid off. I therefore contacted Old Republic who paid off and  sued the Mc Neilsfor the pay off.   I was then countersued by the McNeils on the Grounds they had paid off. Attorney Gullen represented the McNeils. On his brief he accused me of fraud without any evidence. On 7/27/2014 I filed  Summary Judgment since There are no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in this complaint can be decided without trial. Click on following link for detail. After I recused two Judges the case was assigned to Judge Patricia Lucas who turned out to be most brazenly corrupt Judge I have ever encountered. Within two months I identified 130 Criminal violations of the California Penal Code she committed. I appealed to Judge Walsh in every one of my more than ten motions, but he stonewalled me and ignored every motions.

Lucas  denied my summary Judgment which she could not, based on CCP585 which states a summary Judgment must be granted if defendant does not dispute the Judgment. Gullen never filed an opposing motion. This proves he bribed Judge Lucas.

Amended summary Judgment

Judge Walsh protects Judge Lucas and attorney Gullen

Judge Walsh refuses to suspend Judge Patricia Lucas who does not dispute 130 criminal violations of the California penal Code. He refuses to grant my summary Judgments. He refuses to sanction Attorney Gullen although I have proven he has bribed Judge Lucas. he is also accessory to the above criminal violations including bribery. Judge Walsh must be recalled and removed from the bench which he has disgraced.

Judge Walsh is the Presiding Judge of  Santa Clara County.It his his   duty by law to promote access to Justice to all members of the Public. He has sworn the following oath

                    28 U.S. Code § 453 – Oaths of justices and judges

t

                     : “I, Brian Walsh, do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will  faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me  under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”.

However, Judge Walsh has secretly sworn another Oath

 : “I, Brian Walsh, do solemnly swear that I will protect my fellow criminal Judges,  the hell with  justice without respect to the persons, and do zero right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will  with great zeal trample the  Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me myself.”. 

I

. Judge Walsh thinks he is immune and impervious to the laws of our Country.

This case has been going on since June 17/2014. The Court has subjected me to a constant barrage of illegal Maneuvers. I have made a study of the ratings of the 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior court and have found out of the 89  only six honest enough to render Justice. The Court assigned two Judges  to my case who I immediately recused. The third Judge assigned was Patricia Lucas. Upon checking her ratings on the Robing Room Site which rates Judges I found out that she is totally prejudiced. Click on the following link and you find out she has six ratings from defendants whose rights have been trampled by her.

  Lucas ratings.pdf

Therefore I recused her  on 8/12/2014, based on ccp 170.1 which states recusal is appropriate if you suspect prejudice.  She struck the recusal on 9/18/2014. Between 8/12/2014 and today 9/25/2014, I have filed over ten motions addressed to Presiding Judge Walsh to recuse her. In the process I identified against her 54 Criminal Violations of the California Penal code. I filed a summary Judgment against The McNeils which were not answered and therefore should have been granted by the Court. Nevertheless, Judge Lucas Issued a tentative order on 8/18/2014  which she finalized on 8/18/2014 although Attorney Gullen did not show up at the hearing on 8/19/2014. This clearly proved Gullen conspiring with Judge Lucas to deny me my due process. Following link shows How Judge Walsh has broken the law.

    Motion for Judge Walsh to enforce the law 

The final straw occurred when Judge Pichon wrote me  a letter totally absolving Judge Lucas from any wrong doing.This, after she never disputed the 54 criminal violations of the California Penal Code against her. This shows conclusively she is a criminal. In Spite of all this Judge Walsh allows her to continue presiding in Court, a brazen violation of the statutes. Click on following

   Judge Pichon Letter

nRichard gullen

Attorney Richard Gullen, a corrupt attorney

 

The California State Bar is a criminal enterprise

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The State Bar and their buddies Judges and attorneys

 

 

The state bar is a criminal Enterprise

 

Background: My complaints  to the Bar Association against the following Judges: Lucas, Kirwan, Walsh, Symons and Attorney Gullen were filed on 11/27/2014 for the following :

As of Nov 26, 2014 Judges Walsh, Kirwan, Symons and Attorney Gullen are accessories to 246 criminal violations of the California Penal Code by Judge Lucas who never filed answers to the following motions:

 

Default Judgments

On 8/16/2014 I filed the following default Judgments which Judge Lucas did not dispute or answer : Judge Walsh must grant the following default Judgments by law:

1: Default Judgment to impeach Judge Lucas

Default Judgment to suspend Judge Lucas

3 Default Judgment to issue and injunction against Judge Lucas

4 Default Judgment to grant summary Judgment of 7/29/2014

5.Default Judgment for Judge Walsh to remove and replace Judge Lucas from 9/25/2014 Hearing.

  1. Default Judgment for Judge Walsh to disqualify Judge Lucas from any Judicial duties per the injunction, supension and impeachment
  1. Default Judgment to vacate Judge Lucas’ 8/27/2014 Order to dismiss 7/29/2014 Summary Judgment. Check following link

   Motion to file impeachment proceeding 

The tentative rulings issued by Judge Lucas on 9/25/2014 show she continues her Judicial duties though barred by law to act as a Judge.

Judge Walsh

Judge Walsh ignored every one of the above default Judgments to show he upholds the law and is not influenced by any misguided loyalty to corrupt Judges.

Judge Walsh is Judge Lucas’s partner in crime. Judge Walsh trespasses on the law and brazenly disregards the safety of the public from Criminal Judge Lucas. He is accessory to 246 Criminal Violations of the California Penal Code plus additional violations shown below

Judge Lucas and Attorney Gullen

Between 9/11/2014 and today, 11/26/2014 the following evidence shows further proof of bribery of Judge Lucas by Gullen. This concerns  oppositions filed by Gullen on behalf of Judge Lucas.

1: Court to summarily suspend Judge Lucas

2.To assign an  Impartial Judge

3.To vacate Judge Lucas Null and Void order

 

 

In this motion, Gullen asserts no evidence that he bribed Judge Lucas. However, Lucas did not dispute the charges which proves indeed she was bribed by Gullen. Also Gullen did not dispute the bribery charges.

On Oct 14, I filed a motion to suspend attorney Gullen from the case which he did not dispute. Therefore he is barred from this case and violated the law by filing  on Nov 6, 2014, an opposition to my motion to compel Superior Court judges to remove criminal Judge Lucas from the bench. It is obvious he conspired with Judge Lucas to wipe out my motion. Click on following link

Santa Clara Superior Court is a criminal enterprise 

Judges Kirwan and Symons

                                    Judge Symons

 

On Nov 7, 2014, I filed motions against Judges Kirwan and Symons . Judge Ariadne Symons filed an order on 10/31/2014 denying motion to recuse Judge Lucas. Symons is out of Jurisdiction since she is a family Judge of the Superior Court of Watsonville, Santa Cruz county. She therefore became accessory to 246 criminal violations of the California Penal Code by Judge Lucas plus additional violations shown below

 

Judge Kirwan

On October 21 I filed the following motions:

Amended Motion for Judge   Kirwan to grant default

Judgment  Motion for Judge Kirwan to preside at Oct 30, 2014 hearing

As Judge It was his duty to abide by the above motions since he did not file any opposition He knew Judge Lucas was barred from presiding in any and all cases since I had impeached her and she did not dispute those default Judgments.

Therefore, by refusing to perform his judicial duties, Judge Kirwan became accessory to 246 criminal violations of the California Penal Code and must be disbarred.He has failed his duty to administer Justice plus additional violations shown below.

 

Updated criminal violations

 

Original violations were 246. There is an additional 14 for 10/13/2014, see below. Also on Nov 6.2014 Lucas issued 14 rulings which makes 98 further violations. The total now 358 criminal violations of the California Penal Code

Motion to compel Santa Clara DA to prosecute Judges Walsh, Lucas,Symons, Kirwan and attorney Gullen

 

Santa Clara DA must prosecute above parties who have conspired to commit fraud, perjury, obstruction of Justice, abuse of power, bribery, denial of due process, denial of equal protection under the law. The total criminal violations are 358.

From above report it is more than obvious the four Judges: Lucas, Walsh, Kirwan, Symons, and Attorney Gullen do not belong on the bench or practicing law and must be cast out  from the Court  and disbarred for the protection of the public.

Motion to prosecute

 ———————————————————————-

State Bar of California 

Click of State Bar letter     State Bar Reply to complaint 

The State Bar of California is an administrative arm of the California Supreme Court, protecting the public and seeking to improve the justice system for more than 80 years. All lawyers practicing law in California must be members of the State Bar.

This is well and good, however the truth is something else. As referred to Case 114CV258827 the Bar association has brazenly covered up the criminal actions of four Judges of the Santa Clara Superior Court and an attorney who did not dispute the criminal charges above. The bar association  absolves above Judges and Attorney knowing full well they are criminals. I can only conclude that the Bar Association is  a criminal enterprise accessory to 356 criminal violations of the California Penal Code and whose secret goal is to shield criminal Judges and Attorneys from just punishment

—————————————————————————-

Based on my complaint The bar association asserts the following:

 

Bar Association: You have previously filed a motion to recall Judge Walsh and Judge Lucas, which was denied.

Marosi: False, That motion was never denied. The Bar association covers up the criminal acts of the above parties,therefore it is guilty of perjury, abuse of power, obstruction of Justice, conspiracy to commit fraud, accessory to 358 criminal violations of the California Penal Code.

I have filed motions to disbar Judges Walsh, Kirwan, Lucas, Symons and Attorney Gullen based not on allegations but on motions against parties above which were not disputed. Therefore the above admitted their guilt and must be disbarred by Law.

Above Judges and attorney ignored the rules of the court since they never disputed my motions as required by CCP854C  as follows:

2014 California Rules of Court

Rule 8.54. Motions

(c) Failure to oppose motion: A failure to oppose a motion may be deemed a consent to  granting of the motion.

 

——————————————

Bar Association: As to your complaints against Judges Lucas, Walsh and Kirwan, please be advides that the State Bar has no authority to consider your complaint because judges are not active members of the State Bar.

Marosi: Whether or not Judges are not active members of the Bar is irrelevant, they are members of the Bar and must abide by the Bar’s rule of ethics. They have committed criminal acts and therefore must be disbarred by Law.

————————

 

Bar Association: As to your complaint against Mr. Gullen, we do not have sufficient facts before us that Mr. Gullen has been involved in or convicted of any crimes. Mere speculation does not provide the basis for investigation.

Marosi: I have filed over 15 motions against above parties including Mr. Gullen, none of them disputed. The Bar association has access to all these motions. My motions against above parties have not been disputed, therefore those parties must be disbarred. It is evident the bar brazenly acts as counsel for those criminals.

The criminal Judges and attorney do not even bother to dispute the motions. They are confident the Court and the Bar Association will cover up for them. The Bar association tramples the constitutional rights of the public and   is composed of criminals paid by the tax payers to screw them!

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crimes against society by the Santa Clara Superior Court

 

 

 

 

corrupt judges

   The real face of Judge Patricia Lucas

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA         Taking the masks off Judges

To all members of the press This is a press release of Corruption in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving Presiding Judge Brian Walsh, Judge Lucas and Attorney Richard Gullen                                       You may reach me at 650-969-2457 and my email is gmarosi@aol

Santa Clara superior Court is a criminal organization   On 9/23/2014 I filed an amended motion for all 89 Judges of the Santa ClaraSuperior Court to recall Judge Walsh. because of his brazen disregard for the law, Presiding Judge Walsh still  allows Criminal Judge Lucas to remain on the bench in spite of her pleading guilty by default to  130 criminal violations of the California Penal Code including bribery.  of

As of today October 16/2014 there is no sign of any reaction by the Judges to recall Walsh. Does this not mean that the entire Court is criminal? Judge for yourself!  

    Background: On May 10th 2013, I mailed Old Republic title a demand for $82,184 for a property at 144 South 20th, San Jose which 2d deed of trust to the former owners the Mc Neils  had not been paid of. On Dec 23rd, 1991 a deed of trust for the amount of $   2 6, 000  was recorded in book L797 of official records , page 281.

On 8/1/2003, I received a payoff demand from Alliance Title for $26,000 which I signed on 9/3/2003 and mailed back on 9/3/2003. Alliance did not pay me off. Around April of 2013 I found the original note of $26,000 for that property and realized that it was never paid off. I therefore contacted Old Republic who paid off and  sued the Mc Neils for the pay off.   I was then countersued by the McNeils on the Grounds they had paid off.

On 7/27/2014 I filed  Summary Judgment since There are no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in this complaint can be decided without trial

. Click on following link for detail. After I recused two Judges the case was assigned to Judge Patricia Lucas who turned out to be most brazenly corrupt Judge I have ever encountered. Within two months I identified 130 Criminal violations of the California Penal Code she committed. I appealed to Judge Walsh in every one of my more than ten motions, but he stonewalled me and ignored every motions. Amended summary Judgment

                    A primer in Court Procedure  

At this point, the reader might say that since I am a pro-per litigant, I don’t know what I am talking about. Maybe I am a disgruntled litigant who dislikes the ruling of an impartial Judge and raises all kinds of hell about it. well, that is not true. I have been fighting corruption in the Courts for over five years now and found out a bunch of stuff. First, Judges hate pro-per litigants because they don’t identify with them.

They are originally attorneys who became Judges, not through competence, but through cronyism. They get elected or appointed because they have the mouth, they have buddies in the Legal profession and they get pulled to the position of a Judge. They pay no attention to the oath of Justices. Their primary allegiance is to their fellow judges. Hang society. They could care less.

So, how do they screw Pro-per litigants? All sorts of way. Ignore evidence, ignore the laws, deny due process, accept bribes from the attorneys, either as money or as a favor, or just because they hate pro-per Litigants. In my case, I had filed a summary Judgment against the McNeils which had not been opposed, so Judge Lucas should have granted me the motion per CCP585.

Instead, she wrote a  tentative ruling dismissing my motion based on the merits which she had no business doing since she had to by law grant the motion. It should have been a slam dunk. A motion filed in court must be answered no less that nine court days before the hearing. If not answered then the motion must be granted by law. After that the pro-per files a motion for default Judgment which must be granted by law.

From the outset of this case I filed about twenty motions undisputed by either Attorney Gullen or Judge Lucas. Then I filed about seven Motion for default Judgments again unanswered by Judge Lucas or Judge Walsh or Attorney Gullen. None of those motions were granted or acknowledged. I filed motions with the court to suspend, impeach, recuse, injunct, remove Lucas from the bench.. I filed motions  for all 89 Judges to recall  Presiding Judge Walsh .

This  since he should have booted Lucas from the bench for all her criminal violations of the California Penal Code.  None of these motions were granted. They were all ignored, as if I don’t exist.   Superior Court for sale.Judge Walsh protects Judge Lucas and attorney Gullen   The Superior Court is for sale if you are an attorney litigating against a pro-per litigant.

None of the Judges of the Santa Clara Superior Court will acknowledge pro-per litigators. Any case a pro per files in the Superior Court of Santa Clara will be a slam dunk for the attorney whatever the merits of the case is. Judge Walsh refuses to suspend Judge Patricia Lucas who does not dispute 130 criminal violations of the California penal Code.

He refuses to grant my summary Judgments. He refuses to sanction Attorney Gullen although I have proven he has bribed Judge Lucas. he is also accessory to the above criminal violations including bribery. Judge Walsh must be recalled and removed from the bench which he has disgraced. Judge Walsh is the Presiding Judge of  Santa Clara County.It his his  duty by law to promote access to Justice to all members of the Public. He has sworn the following oath

                    28 U.S. Code § 453 – Oaths of  justices and judges

t                      : “I, Brian Walsh, do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will  faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me  under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”.

However, Judge Walsh has secretly sworn another Oath  : “I, Brian Walsh, do solemnly swear that I will protect my fellow criminal Judges,  the hell with  justice without respect to the persons, and do zero right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will  with great zeal trample the  Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me myself.”.       

I . Judge Walsh thinks he is immune and impervious to the laws of our Country.   This case has been going on since June 17/2014. The Court has subjected me to a constant barrage of illegal Maneuvers. I have made a study of the ratings of the 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior court and have found out of the 89  only six honest enough to render Justice. The Court assigned two Judges  to my case who I immediately recused.

The third Judge assigned was Patricia Lucas. Upon checking her ratings on the Robing Room Site which rates Judges I found out that she is totally prejudiced. Click on the following link and you find out she has six ratings from defendants whose rights have been trampled by her.  

 Lucas ratings.pdf

Therefore I recused her  on 8/12/2014, based on ccp 170.1 which states recusal is appropriate if you suspect prejudice.  She struck the recusal on 9/18/2014. Between 8/12/2014 and today 9/25/2014, I have filed over ten motions addressed to Presiding Judge Walsh to recuse her. In the process I identified against her 54 Criminal Violations of the California Penal code.

I filed a summary Judgment against The McNeils which were not answered and therefore should have been granted by the Court. Nevertheless, Judge Lucas Issued a tentative order on 8/18/2014  which she finalized on 8/18/2014 although Attorney Gullen did not show up at the hearing on 8/19/2014. Following link shows How Judge Walsh has broken the law.  

  Motion for Judge Walsh to enforce the law 

The final straw occurred when Judge Pichon wrote me  a letter totally absolving Judge Lucas from any wrong doing.This, after she never disputed the 54 criminal violations of the California Penal Code against her. This shows conclusively she is a criminal. In Spite of all this Judge Walsh allows her to continue presiding in Court, a brazen violation of the statutes. Click on following    

  Judge Pichon Letter

Patricia Lucas

Judge Patricia Lucas is a Judge at the Santa Clara Superior Court
  • She was appointed by former governor Gray Davis in December 2002 to succeed Edwin Pearce, II.[1][2]  
  •  Why did  she allow herself to be bribed by Attorney Gullen and accumulate a total of 130 criminal violations of the California Penal Code  
    • Judicial rating: F 

  • WalshJudge Brian Walsh was first appointed to the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara County in 2000 and is currently the Assistant Presiding Judge. Assistant Presiding Judge Walsh was admitted to the Bar in 1972 and earned his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Notre Dame and his Juris Doctor from University of California Berkeley Law School (Boalt Hall).
  • Above about Judge Walsh is well and good but does not explain why he allowed himself to be bribed byAttorney Gullen  and accumulate a total of 130 criminal violations of the California Penal Code  

    Judicial rating: F 

     

Santa Clara Superior Court is a criminal organization

criminal-Judge-Lucas-photo

To all members of the press

This is a press release of Corruption in the Santa Clara Superior Court involving Presiding Judge Brian Walsh, Judge Lucas and Attorney Richard Gullen

                                      You may reach me at 650-969-2457 and my email is      gmarosi@aol

 

 Santa Clara superior Court is a criminal organization

 

On 9/23/2014 I filed an amended motion for all 89 Judges of the Santa ClaraSuperior Court to recall Judge Walsh.

because of his brazen disregard for the law, Presiding Judge Walsh still  allows Criminal Judge Lucas to remain on the bench in spite of her pleading guilty by default to  130 criminal violations of the California Penal Code including bribery.  of   As of today October 16/2014 there is no sign of any reaction by the Judges to recall Walsh. Does this not mean that the entire Court is criminal? Judge for yourself!

     Background:

On May 10th 2013, I mailed Old Republic title a demand for $82,184 for a property at 144 South 20th, San Jose which 2d deed of trust to the former owners the Mc Neils  had not been paid of. On Dec 23rd, 1991 a deed of trust for the amount of $   2 6, 000  was recorded in book L797 of official records , page 281.On 8/1/2003, I received a payoff demand from Alliance Title for $26,000 which I signed on 9/3/2003 and mailed back on 9/3/2003. Alliance did not pay me off.

Around April of 2013 I found the original note of $26,000 for that property and realized that it was never paid off. I therefore contacted Old Republic who paid off and  sued the Mc Neilsfor the pay off.   I was then countersued by the McNeils on the Grounds they had paid off. On 7/27/2014 I filed  Summary Judgment since There are no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in this complaint can be decided without trial. Click on following link for detail. After I recused two Judges the case was assigned to Judge Patricia Lucas who turned out to be most brazenly corrupt Judge I have ever encountered. Within two months I identified 130 Criminal violations of the California Penal Code she committed. I appealed to Judge Walsh in every one of my more than ten motions, but he stonewalled me and ignored every motions.

Amended summary Judgment

Superior Court for sale.Judge Walsh protects Judge Lucas and attorney Gullen

The Superior Court is for sale if you are an attorney litigating against a pro-per litigant. None of the Judges of the Santa Clara Superior Court will acknowledge pro-per litigators. Any case a pro per files in the Superior Court of Santa Clara will be a slam dunk for the attorney whatever the merits of the case is.

Judge Walsh refuses to suspend Judge Patricia Lucas who does not dispute 130 criminal violations of the California penal Code. He refuses to grant my summary Judgments. He refuses to sanction Attorney Gullen although I have proven he has bribed Judge Lucas. he is also accessory to the above criminal violations including bribery. Judge Walsh must be recalled and removed from the bench which he has disgraced.

Judge Walsh is the Presiding Judge of  Santa Clara County.It his his   duty by law to promote access to Justice to all members of the Public. He has sworn the following oath

                    28 U.S. Code § 453 – Oaths of justices and judges

t

                     : “I, Brian Walsh, do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will  faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me  under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”.

 

However, Judge Walsh has secretly sworn another Oath

 : “I, Brian Walsh, do solemnly swear that I will protect my fellow criminal Judges,  the hell with  justice without respect to the persons, and do zero right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will  with great zeal trample the  Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me myself.”. 

 

. Judge Walsh thinks he is immune and impervious to the laws of our Country.

This case has been going on since June 17/2014. The Court has subjected me to a constant barrage of illegal Maneuvers. I have made a study of the ratings of the 89 Judges of the Santa Clara Superior court and have found out of the 89  only six honest enough to render Justice. The Court assigned two Judges  to my case who I immediately recused. The third Judge assigned was Patricia Lucas. Upon checking her ratings on the Robing Room Site which rates Judges I found out that she is totally prejudiced. Click on the following link and you find out she has six ratings from defendants whose rights have been trampled by her.

  Lucas ratings.pdf

Therefore I recused her  on 8/12/2014, based on ccp 170.1 which states recusal is appropriate if you suspect prejudice.  She struck the recusal on 9/18/2014. Between 8/12/2014 and today 9/25/2014, I have filed over ten motions addressed to Presiding Judge Walsh to recuse her. In the process I identified against her 54 Criminal Violations of the California Penal code. I filed a summary Judgment against The McNeils which were not answered and therefore should have been granted by the Court. Nevertheless, Judge Lucas Issued a tentative order on 8/18/2014  which she finalized on 8/18/2014 although Attorney Gullen did not show up at the hearing on 8/19/2014. Following link shows How Judge Walsh has broken the law.

    Motion for Judge Walsh to enforce the law 

The final straw occurred when Judge Pichon wrote me  a letter totally absolving Judge Lucas from any wrong doing.This, after she never disputed the 54 criminal violations of the California Penal Code against her. This shows conclusively she is a criminal. In Spite of all this Judge Walsh allows her to continue presiding in Court, a brazen violation of the statutes. Click on following

 

   Judge Pichon Letter

 

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome Corruption in the Courts

Log in

Lost your password?